O'Reilly Says "Anarchy!" In California
Anarchy? Pfft. Get real. Though in fact anarchy is precisely what we probably need here, we need the State out of marriage.
Why just look at 'em, they're happier than pigs in slop (and maybe not a whole lot prettier).
The conservatives are shrieking, "One man and one woman!!" Come on, look at these two again, isn't this close enough?
They say marriage is an economic institution. Fine then, what's the problem? If these two turn out to hate each other in seven years like 50+% of married heterosexual uprights, then let the courts figure out the division of property. That'll teach these two to be more careful next time about what they ask for.
Gays are shrieking, "If her employer offers medical benefits then I want to be insured as her legal spouse." Look, companies should stop insuring legal spouses, period. They're not legally required to anyway. If you work for the company, great, you're eligible for insurance, but not your spouse(s), or maybe even your kids for that matter. For Christ sake, it seems anymore people are getting jobs just so they can get insured, not because they want to work, or because they're any good at actually doing the work. Besides, the way this country is going, all uprights will be policy holders of public national insurance before long anyhow, and this so-called marital benefit will be moot; neither you nor your spouse(s) will even have to be employed to get health insurance.
So what really is the State's beef with gay marriage anyway? Or polygamy or any other consensual union for that matter? Heterosexual marriage sure as hell ain't the unshakable stanchion of society as some conservatives want to believe it is, not at a 50+% failure rate (
> 70% in the western US).
O'Reilly wants the mayor of SF arrested because -- ooh, are you ready for this -- he broke the law. Pfft, who cares? The law -- this law -- is an ass.