Individual
Now and then Master weighs in at No Treason, a thread of the web where people take their individualism kinda seriously, if not also their shameless adoration of female uprights, all of whom, I guess if you're an upright, are really something to behold. As for me, give me Maisey (foreground right) any day -- Va Va Voom!
From When The Levy Breaks, Joshua Holmes writes:
Trebling the foolishness is the White Man's Burden currently being touted as the reason for being there, a "burden" that was little more than a cover for economic exploitation and untrammelled savagery by supposedly civilised nations 100 years ago, a "burden" which tells us that the state can remake and ought to remake benighted societies through the massive application of force. No one should have to tell us what sort of disaster this entails.
Master replies:
The opposing view here would argue that not all recent massive applications of force by the State were a disaster. Consider, they would counter, what the State accomplished in Japan. (Tho personally speaking I'm not sure Japan was benighted, per se, at least not in the way we would probably agree the tyrant in Iraq was). To say nothing of the fact that Japan actually attacked us first. But that goes to motivation, not the success one way or another of the massive application of force.
Anyway, I always thought this opposing view was a tough nut to argue against. It hasn't turned me into an apologist for the State, I'm just saying.